Michael Zey
futurist3000@aol.com
Noah's New Ark
The imminent birth of a cloned gaur signals a new approach to
preservation
BY MARYANN BIRD/LONDON
Noah's Ark has set sail again, crossing stormy scientific
waters and buffeted by winds of controversy. Unlike the Old
Testament vessel, however, today's metaphorical ark is not
carrying threatened animals two by two to safety. Rather, if
it lives up to its billing, it could produce potentially
unlimited numbers of endangered creatures.
In the updated story, though, Noah is not the skipper of the
rescue project. Instead, it's the name given in advance to the
clone of a dead gaur, an endangered wild ox found in India,
Bangladesh and Southeast Asia. The new Noah is expected to be
born any day now to Bessie, a cow living on a farm near Sioux
City, Iowa. Cows have given birth to gaurs before, but this is
the first time that one animal species is acting as surrogate
mother to a clone--an exact genetic duplicate--of a different
species. "The gaur is developing well," says Emily Poe, a
spokeswoman for Advanced Cell Technologies. A small
biotechnology company based in Worcester, Mass., ACT is using
a novel cross-species nuclear-transfer technique that could
usher in what it sees as a new era in conservation.
Bessie's ultrasound tests may look good, but is the concept
itself a sound one? Robert Lanza, ACT's vice president of
medical and scientific development, says the technique is not
a panacea but "presents exciting possibilities" that may help
rescue endangered species and perhaps even reverse
extinctions. Other scientists aren't so sure. They argue that
such high-tech approaches are unlikely to make a significant
contribution to the support of vulnerable species, especially
if their habitats have been destroyed.
Still, if Bessie's little gaur is delivered safely, the birth
will come as a boost to many biologists in the U.S. and Europe
who are engaged in a range of "assisted reproduction"
conservation strategies. These include artificial insemination
and in vitro fertilization. In particular, though, Noah's
arrival will hearten the scientists at ACT, who recently
signed a deal with Spanish officials to attempt to clone the
bucardo, an extinct mountain goat native to the Pyrenees. The
last bucardo died a year ago, struck by a falling tree in its
final habitat, northern Spain's Ordesa National Park.
Scientists had already preserved a quantity of its cells, and
ACT hopes to transfer them into other goats' eggs, perhaps
later this year.
The cloning technique used with Bessie--the only cow in the
experiment to carry an embryo into late pregnancy--is a
variation of the procedure that created Dolly the sheep, the
world's first cloned mammal. A needle is jabbed through an
egg's protective layer and used to remove the egg's nucleus,
containing most of a cell's genetic material. A second needle
is used to inject a whole cell under the egg's outer layer. To
complete the process, an electrical current fuses the new cell
to the egg. The embryo starts to divide until, within days,
the mass of cells grows to about 100 and is big enough to be
implanted in the surrogate mother's uterus.
The creation of Noah began with the fusing of skin cells from
a male gaur and 692 cow eggs. Just 81 grew into blastocysts
(clumps of cells suitable for implantation), and 42 of those
were inserted into 32 cows, of which eight became pregnant.
Two of the fetuses were later removed for study, while five
cows sustained spontaneous abortions. Only Bessie and Noah are
left.
As ACT scientists await the clone's birth, other wildlife
researchers express doubts about the project's conservation
claims and think the wrong message is being sent. "We do not
believe that cloning has any relevance to the routine
management and conservation of endangered species," says David
Wildt, a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Institution's
Conservation and Research Center in Front Royal, Va. Instead,
Wildt favors low-tech methods, like the artificial
insemination used to breed the endangered black-footed ferret,
which is now being reintroduced to the American West. "Our
laboratory works all over the world with the rarest of
species," he says, "and not once have I ever heard a real
wildlife manager or wildlife scientist say, 'Gee, we must
attempt to save this species using cloning.'"
To William Holt, a research fellow at the Institute of Zoology
in London, the best approach is to learn more about species'
reproductive systems and the social conditions that can make
animals want to breed naturally. "If you know those things,
you can improve success rates a lot without doing anything
invasive." Where cloning technology may be useful, Holt
allows, is "where the species is down to 50 or so. You could
sample cells from all of them. You could re-create all of
these 50 individuals. You've still got the genetic variability
that is important." Failing to do so, he suggests, could
result in populations that lack the genetic diversity to fight
off disease, setting the creatures up for a second extinction.
Suitable habitats are also necessary. "You've got to ask, Are
we helping these animals into the future?"
Helping animals into the future is a priority for the world's
wildlife researchers as an ever growing number of species
become imperiled each year. Oliver Ryder, a geneticist at the
San Diego Zoo's Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species,
is the driving force behind a 25-year effort to assemble a
bank of frozen dna, eggs and sperm from endangered species.
Under his direction, the frozen zoo now has living cells from
5,400 animals spanning more than 400 species and subspecies,
cultured and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
One missing creature is often on Ryder's mind. "Could you take
a cell from a Morro Bay kangaroo rat and bring it back, and
would it be the same?" he asks. "There are a lot of questions,
but we don't have that option now because nobody saved the
cells" while lab work was being conducted on the rodent in the
1970s. "The future will want to know about these species, and
the lingua franca of biology is increasingly going to be
genomic information. If nobody saves the dna of these samples,
it's going to be a very fragmented picture." There is also a
present-day, practical side. By providing vital clues to the
mingling of subspecies and the types of environment they
require, genetic data can help zoologists care for endangered
animals in captivity.
Using science to save vanishing species is becoming a global
pursuit. Robert Mauget and colleagues at France's National
Museum of Natural History, which includes four zoo parks,
recently became the first to produce deer embryos in vitro.
The technique--incorporating frozen semen and oocytes, or
developing egg cells--is expected to be applied later this
year to rare and endangered deer species, with more common
types acting as surrogate mothers. The French are also talking
with colleagues in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan about how they
may help rebuild populations of Bactrian (Bukharian) deer in
Central Asia. "Basically, we're hoping to give them our
recipe," says Mauget.
At Austria's Salzburg Zoo, scientists are developing a recipe
they hope will lead to the first production of white rhinos
through artificial insemination. Franz Schwarzenberger of
Vienna's University of Veterinary Medicine believes success
with the tricky technique could help save even more endangered
rhino species, such as the northern white. "It may be possible
to collect semen in the wild and inseminate animals in
captivity," he says. "This kind of assisted reproduction
offers us a chance to improve the gene pool of the captive
population without taking resources from the wild."
After years of watching one species after another become
extinct, researchers are sounding optimistic. "We don't have
the right to do nothing," says Mauget, who predicts that
interzoo exchanges of sperm, oocytes and embryos will develop
rapidly. "Instead of shipping our animals from one zoo to
another, we'll be sending sperm to the four corners of the
earth." Meanwhile, in a corner of Iowa, another kind of
delivery is awaited.
REPORTED BY EDWARD BARNES/NEW YORK, DAN CRAY/LOS ANGELES, TALA
SKARI/PARIS AND JANE WALKER/MADRID
CANDIDATES FOR CLONING?
Gaurs are not the only endangered species that could use a
high-tech hand
GIANT PANDA WHITE RHINOCEROS BACTRIAN DEER
Time: JANUARY 8, 2001 VOL. 157 NO. 1
SCIENCE